top of page

The, "๐‘พ๐’‰๐’š ๐‘ถ๐’๐’๐’š ๐‘ต๐’๐’˜?" Question [And Answer] (2 Mins Read):

Please Note:

US Courts have repeatedly ruled that personal blogs are Constitutionally-protected expressions of free speech.

This is a personal blog.

ย Of Course, The Troopers Reined The Dinosaurs In.

But Why Were The Troopers Even Needed?

(CONTEXT:ย ย Literally hundreds of Constitutionally-protected signs on ourย bulletin board promoting our FB page and blog have been stolen over the past decade or so. We finally realized it was dumb of us to keep hoping that one day those dinosaurs would behave at all decently, so we finally called the Troopers.)

Only A Few Of MANY Questions:

Why did the obviously morally bankrupt GFAb.o.d.ย think for a decade that it was perfectly fine to break the Law by both committing (I have their confession in writing) and endorsing (by refusing to even ask their toadies to stop, also in writing) literally hundreds of thefts and civil right violations?

Why do they think that itโ€™s OK to (IMHO) lie to the IRS and stick all of usย with the responsibility for their lies? (look up the word โ€œserveโ€, please)

Why were our decade-long pleas to them to simply askย their neo-fascist toadies to stop committing hundreds of crimes flatly turned down (yes, really, and again in writing) by supposed "lawyers" ?

Why did the concepts of decency and tolerance and acceptance and inclusion and legality only occur to them afterย our patience finally ran out, resulting in multiple police interactions with (this time legitimate - unlike fibiger and wood) GFA President rodriquez?

How do supposed dinosaur "lawyers"ย (we have not yet seen a respected attorneyย in the cohort, especially not GFA President rodriguez who horrifyingly self-identifies as having been "blessed" with an appointment to the NYS judicial system) justify to themselves that breaking the Law is fine when it harms someone they don't personally like, while somehow managing to completely forget the Law they studied and then practiced for years?

Rhetorical questions, cuz we all know the answer:ย 


Those dinosaurs are (IMHO) ridiculously authoritarian, frustrated, bitter, unhappy, angry, personally failed, professionally failed, incompetent and divisive neo-fascists "led" by petty dictator-wannabe and apparent Von ShitzInPantz's admirer rodriguez, who think they are somehow magically above the Law.ย  They really might want to watch the news occasionally to see what is happening to their apparent role model hero and orange adjudicated rapist - formerly the most powerful individual in the world.

You will notย escape Justice nor Karma, dinosaurs .

Please Vote Wisely, Not Habitually.

Thank you very much for your DEEPLYย appreciated

and ongoing support in 2024 and beyond!! :-)

53 views0 comments


bottom of page